Workgroup on Solidarity Socio-Economy





   

  August 28, 2008
Workgroup on Solidarity Socio-Economy A Strategic Agenda for the 21st Century

documents
more documents
books
Solidarity Economy: Building Alternatives for People and Planet
By Julie Matthaei, Jenna Allard & Carl Davidson
April, 2008


Asian Forum for Solidarity Economy
Manila (Philippines)
October 17-20, 2007
Mapping of the strategic lines

  General Map: Socio-Economic Agenda for the 21st Century
| centered map |
  Strategic Line 1: Facilitate changes in values and representations
| centered map | Visual Mind |
  The change to implement in values and representations appears as a major transversal strategic line. It is a dimension which has been considered for a long time within the alliance, with a pole called Values, Art, Culture, Education, Science and through the reflections in the Governance/Citizenship pole. We must complete it from a socio-economic perspective. I propose to state here common Values, and underline the need for Ecoliteracy: literacy in the principles of Socio-Economy as well as Ecology. This idea emerged from the reading of F. Capra and I will develop it in a future message. message.
  Strategic Line 2: Acknowledge and consolidate the emergence of new socioeconomic practices
| centered map | Visual Mind |
  This SL is the one I have added to the scheme (map) I had presented you in Dourdan. I believe it is important to underline this notion of emergence and already existing practices and differentiate them from the other strategic line related to practices, which is Building Sustainable Communities, and which is more an overall objective than a perceptible reality. We should perhaps add "new sustainable socioeconomic practices based on sustainability and solidarity", but that would be a little too long. I have already mentionned that this SL will have two sub lines: solidarity socio-economy practices, and innovations/mutation in company practices. Details in a future message.
  Strategic Line 3: Towards another development paradigm
| centered map | Visual Mind |
  *Build Sustainable Communities* is a major dimension for action and synergies. At this level (starting from local communities / territories and building up to national/regional/global level), the convergence and synergies between economical, political, ecological, social and cultural actions can be organized. It is the level that links us (roots us) with the environment and our own nature (allowing well-being). Integration of activities, partnership and scale articulation also start at this level. We should discuss in details the principals and objectives in building those sustainable communities, as well as concrete action (with perhaps examples) that can be done through them.
  Strategic Line 4: Reform the State and its Policies
| centered map | Visual Mind |
  *Reform the State and its Policies* seems a precondition for the global emergence of sustainable communities. This SL comes from the division I did of the "governance" SL in the map presented in Dourdan (the other half is Global Governance). After highliting innovations in the socio-political field related to the economics (such as the participatory budget), we should discuss what the new principles for public action should be at the State level, at what its agenda for new economic policies should be. I have made a proposal based on the reading of the proposal notebooks.
  Strategic Line 5: Build an efficient and legitimate Global Economic Governance
| centered map | Visual Mind |
  *Build an efficient and legitimate Global Economic Governance* (or "Create the conditions for...") is an essential SL for governance, sustainability and dynamic balance. As in State Reform, the challenge is to succeed the transition between vertical hegemonic institutions to a network of institutions answering to the global challenges, that would be under multiple checks and balances. There will be some debate here, as changes need to be deep, debate on the future of Bretton Woods institutions, of the United Nations systems, and moreover on the type of global governance (principles and institutions) we need. But there seems to be an agreement in the Alliance and the WSSE on a "pluralist and decentralized system of global economic governance".


   

top of page ^


Awele: Reap what you share
powered by Awele